The dual body of human propensity in nature

If human being were to be faced off daringly against god, science and literature both represent dual body of human propensity criteria: one must see outward and the other inward, whilst god can see both. Since science is a cooperation of human, it is social, organizing work of academia; Inevitably, it should be based on probability and falsifiability before the collective validation. A big difference of literature lies against this criterion. Literature is, contrary, a result of human collection. It is only followed by probability and falsifiability in case people "like or feel like " validating. A work by a man is not by itself called literature but it is found and touched to call literature. This is how science goes inward, and literature goes outward as a crossing point of human body and mind: i.e., their cognition, emotion, and action. To see human history, one will see that it has been proceeding in this way; Science whirls and literature diffuses it. These are constitutive per se of human life history.

Comments

On Our Two Sexes

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) lived his life in 19th-century Germany. Although his thoughts and philosophy is very hard for us who lives in 21th-century Japan, and it is too dense to understand, recently I found an interesting verse delivered by Zarathustra (1885), "The happiness of man is, ' I will.' The happiness of woman is, ' He will'" (p. 1174 in Kinddle). This line has apparently been understood as a controversy of men's (or his) insolubility in women, which I do not like to participate here. In addition, the snap judgment of his would be subject to criticism from feminist theory and politicalization in many ways than one. Incidentally, however, there is no denial of interpreting this idea from the point of view of natural science. Male sex drives. The strength of man comes from his weakness, want . Further, men simply believe that hiding their weakness must lead to their own happiness. Therefore, men's happiness is not cau

KARA'S TEAR REVIEWED Kara was an anomalistic artificial intelligence which emitted a desire to survive. Yet, in the real world (2019), nothing is evidenced whether the machines' feeling, as well as animals, is authentic. Having seen this exquisite short film (2012) again, my interest is not in ‘AIs’ that will sooner or later threat us but in the human who will no wonder do an impact exactly when the Wreck Havoc occurs. Men tend to think AIs with IC tips are a threat (like humanoids) because they will become wiser than us in the near future. Contrary, the more realistic tipping point might be in our brain (e.g., right temporoparietal junction, rTPJ): the human social skill, shortly, our fallacious compassion for AIs. How many people will soon become more compassionate being against the increasing ‘AIs,’ as of that in the censor in this short film? The truth is, Japan has already witnessed many such cases in elderly welfare and family funerary with a full-f

CHANGE!

Kurt Lewin is a founder of dynamic collective power (group dynamics) operating on individual's subtly wavering behavior, mind, and life-space. His equation of behavior, B = ｆ (P, E), which was a hypothesis created by his thorough investigations, tells us that B (behavior) is nothing more or less than a function of the P (person) in their E (environment). This is a beginning of social psychology. A sincere reflection on empirical study was made by this evocative psychologist; “There is no theory without practice and no practice without theory.” However, the entire process of practicing and theory making might have never been fulfilled without his belief about people, i.e., they can CHANGE. ao

Longmanox's Page

Search This Blog