On Reinterpretation

What is wisdom? One answer is a reinterpretation.　
To understand what is understood is an easy task; To understand understanding is another: a matter of reinterpretation.
On one hand, people understand the world seen by themselves (necessary perception prior to take an action to survive). This is a matter of the knowledge about the world--what people should learn at school. On the other hand, however, the knowledge usually entails less interpretation than understanding yourself and your behavior. For the latter inquiry, you inevitably turn your eyes to the question of who and how. In other words, as an agent of the understanding, you should describe who you are that is understanding, and how you behave then in relation to your interlocutor and/or your community or society. That is a question of reinterpretation: a question of academism, why people continue to learn after leaving their school. ao

Comments

Why do children cry?

There is a unique thought about why children cry. It posits the effect of the actions you take to stop them from crying. A child is crying. You never walk away. No sooner would it turn challenging when you physically interact with them. Some people will talk to them out of pity. Others pick them up, thinking that stopping them from crying is the priority anyway. Either way, the child will eventually halt crying. What's more interesting is that even if the cause of the crying is unknown, there is always some form of interaction between you (the other one) and the child in the process. In essence, it stands to reason that for humans, the chance to stop crying through interaction with others is far greater than crying alone. Once the assumption that a child crying and the interaction with others are ‘connected’ is established, the child will then cry to seek that ‘connection’ with others, regardless of the cause of the crying. There is no reason, yet the interact...

KARA'S TEAR REVIEWED Kara was an anomalistic artificial intelligence which emitted a desire to survive. Yet, in the real world (2019), nothing is evidenced whether the machines' feeling, as well as animals, is authentic. Having seen this exquisite short film (2012) again, my interest is not in ‘AIs’ that will sooner or later threat us but in the human who will no wonder do an impact exactly when the Wreck Havoc occurs. Men tend to think AIs with IC tips are a threat (like humanoids) because they will become wiser than us in the near future. Contrary, the more realistic tipping point might be in our brain (e.g., right temporoparietal junction, rTPJ): the human social skill, shortly, our fallacious compassion for AIs. How many people will soon become more compassionate being against the increasing ‘AIs,’ as of that in the censor in this short film? The truth is, Japan has already witnessed many such cases in elderly welfa...

Is Communication So Predominant As You Think M ind and idea are fundamental to our life. The very common idea that people communicate with each other to exchange their mind seems hackery and around every corner. However, is the idea you hold the same as in your mind? Is it valid for you to suppose that language is "your" property, which you almost exclusively need when you convey all in your mind? I say this because we share some exceptional cases for the prevailing myth above. Truly, your idea occasionally falls your mind. Or your mind abruptly turns down immediate ideas you have cherished so far. Are you really able to convey meaning through the language you use? Our mind endorses and supports our daily life, whilst people like to talk about communication just because it helps us to communicate, exchange ideas, and socialise! Organic mind wondering, or poetic language is obsolete. People just leave much of the mind behind and hurry off seeking something to propagate,...

Longmanox's Page

Search This Blog