Skip to main content
Is Communication So Predominant As You Think

Mind and idea are fundamental to our life. The very common idea that people communicate with each other to exchange their mind seems hackery and around every corner. However, is the idea you hold the same as in your mind? Is it valid for you to suppose that language is "your" property, which you almost exclusively need when you convey all in your mind? I say this because we share some exceptional cases for the prevailing myth above. Truly, your idea occasionally falls your mind. Or your mind abruptly turns down immediate ideas you have cherished so far. Are you really able to convey meaning through the language you use?


Our mind endorses and supports our daily life, whilst people like to talk about communication just because it helps us to communicate, exchange ideas, and socialise! Organic mind wondering, or poetic language is obsolete. People just leave much of the mind behind and hurry off seeking something to propagate, tweet, and retweet. They may even put you down for not being clear about your "idea" instead of imagining your "mind." But the truth is no full agreement between your mind and idea. This is how you lose like a dog chasing its tail.

Nobody can live alone, true. Communication is a necessary condition for a society but not sufficient for you and your happy life. Simply put, your mind and your idea are different. However, we are easy to forget this state we live happily on. So we are envious of the napping cat; no language, better life! How many days must we spend to distinguish mind from the idea? How many days will we have to better reconcile our idea and mind? ao

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On romance and love

   Mother was not allowed to go to high school when she was young. Subsequently, she allowed me and Key, my sister, to read the world collected works of literature for children. Despite the early days of Japanese tempting  mangas and animation films (mostly for TV, somehow under the influence of American pop culture), we deeply owed much to her grittiness to get opportunities for world great pieces. Without many experiences about romance or love, with what little subjective idea of friendship and persistence, those thoughtful and sophisticated fictions have surely expanded our world dramatically, and they turn over time, more and more, appropriate .    I learned years later that Stendhal (1783-1842) had addressed the issue of life and love in France shortly after the fall of Napoleon Bonaparte. Stendhal said that, I believe it now too, women are braver than the bravest men, which is followed by this below: Only they [women] must have a man to be in ...
Post a Comment
more »
KARA'S TEAR REVIEWED Kara was an anomalistic artificial intelligence which emitted a desire to survive. Yet, in the real world (2019), nothing is evidenced whether the machines' feeling, as well as animals, is authentic. Having seen this exquisite short film (2012) again, my interest is not in ‘AIs’ that will sooner or later threat us but in the human who will no wonder do an impact exactly when the Wreck Havoc occurs.       Men tend to think AIs with IC tips are a threat (like humanoids) because they will become wiser than us in the near future. Contrary, the more realistic tipping point might be in our brain (e.g.,    right temporoparietal junction, rTPJ): the human social skill, shortly, our fallacious compassion for AIs. How many people will soon become more compassionate being against the increasing ‘AIs,’ as of that in the censor in this short film?    The truth is, Japan has already witnessed many such cases in elderly welfa...
Post a Comment
more »

Quality of Life

   Quality of life (QOL) is often discussed to proclaim the quality of mundane opportunity for the physically challenged people such as the blind and/or deaf. It tells us that those who don't inherently see or hear will nonetheless live their life to the same (or even more) extent as most of the others do. However, this idea sheds light upon a more general question of how to think about your origins and encounters: that is, the question of your own interpretation about circumstantial perception and behavior.    Parents spending money for their kid's academic motivation, for example, would probably run against a later glitch, hearing, "It won't pay for God's sake!" When he or she grew up in the college, a pretension of belief that you pay for academic achievement to deserve it is in turn brandished. The thinking runs gradually dry and eventually halts just at the moment of paying tuition. One explanation of this is that the non-creative consumptive society ...
Post a Comment
more »