Skip to main content

Learning a foreign speech in the local context

Learning a foreign language (L2) 

as decoding information (e.g., translation) may be difficult in a local context, such as in schools and communities where no one around speaks the language, but not too difficult to address because we can optimize our first language (L1) to the utmost limit. However, learning L2 speech in the local context in addition to one’s L1 speech is probably the most complicated and collisional challenge if it is compared to the other academic achievements in schools pursuing globalism, such as prulilingualism.

This conflict, which learners, teachers, and theorists as well, often confront, has its origin in a unique feature we experience when we learn or teach any L2. In fact, every teaching plan, in the classroom practice, entails language-in-interaction to maneuver. It is thus doubled in this sense for us to learn L2 speech by speech; that is, because we are orally situated in our community, we need to use a spoken language, and it is so even right at the moment of learning it as the target. Thus, we come to the long disputed question among theorists, how much we should optimize our speech. If we increase L1 to optimize our understanding, it hinders our L2 speech. On the contrary, if we get rid of L1 to optimize our L2, we lose a degree of understanding.


So the bottom line seems to be so far in our persistent, will-or-choice processes of L1 due to this unique difficulty of speech learning. In the countries of monolingual society, such as Japan or Korea, one can hardly acquire the additional linguistic system in a similar way that he or she has spontaneously (or we should say, “subconsciously”) acquired the L1. This being the case, the conflict is obviously attributable to the fact that we have already acquired L1 before the learning starts, and that we cannot even go through this particular process without accelerating and decelerating our L1 process.


It is, therefore, not a question derived from information processing of a sole learner, but an environmental matter of a teacher’s and learners’ mutual engagement that, through the entire class work, how both become habituated to the additional unfamiliar system towards the social commitment for new behaviors or communities. Further, it cost eventually many consistent efforts to attain this achievement and this is why learning L2 in the local context is far more difficult and challenging than learning decoding. ao

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KARA'S TEAR REVIEWED Kara was an anomalistic artificial intelligence which emitted a desire to survive. Yet, in the real world (2019), nothing is evidenced whether the machines' feeling, as well as animals, is authentic. Having seen this exquisite short film (2012) again, my interest is not in ‘AIs’ that will sooner or later threat us but in the human who will no wonder do an impact exactly when the Wreck Havoc occurs.       Men tend to think AIs with IC tips are a threat (like humanoids) because they will become wiser than us in the near future. Contrary, the more realistic tipping point might be in our brain (e.g.,    right temporoparietal junction, rTPJ): the human social skill, shortly, our fallacious compassion for AIs. How many people will soon become more compassionate being against the increasing ‘AIs,’ as of that in the censor in this short film?    The truth is, Japan has already witnessed many such cases in elderly welfare and family funerary with a full-f

On Our Two Sexes

    Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) lived his life in 19th-century Germany. Although his thoughts and philosophy is very hard for us who lives in 21th-century Japan, and it is too dense to understand, recently I found an interesting verse delivered by Zarathustra (1885), "The happiness of man is, ' I will.' The happiness of woman is, ' He will'" (p. 1174 in Kinddle).        This line has apparently been understood as a controversy of men's (or his) insolubility in women, which I do not like to participate here. In addition, the snap judgment of his would be subject to criticism from feminist theory and politicalization  in many ways than one. Incidentally, however, there is no denial of interpreting this idea from the point of view of natural science.    Male sex drives. The strength of man comes from his weakness, want . Further, men simply believe that hiding their weakness must lead to their own happiness. Therefore, men's happiness is not cau

CHANGE!

   Kurt Lewin is a founder of dynamic collective power (group dynamics) operating on individual's subtly wavering behavior, mind, and life-space. His equation of behavior, B = f (P, E), which was a hypothesis created by his thorough investigations, tells us that B (behavior) is nothing more or less than a function of the P (person) in their E (environment). This is a beginning of social psychology. A sincere reflection on empirical study was made by this evocative psychologist; “There is no theory without practice and no practice without theory.” However, the entire process of practicing and theory making might have never been fulfilled without his belief about people, i.e., they can CHANGE.  ao