Two Freedoms

There are two ways

　　　　　　　　　　　of implication for a freedom,

One with your mind, and the other your body.

Freedom of mind is for everything you think,
A world of consciousness: will, decision, inference, and behavior.

Freedom of the body is for the entire rest of all your unconsciousness,
Where you can only sense an ambience, air, or impression around.

"Wow, I can do whatever I like!" you rejoice.
Then, you are talking about the mind freedom.

"What a release," "How comfortable!" you sigh.
Then, you utter the body freedom.

These two are a bit different, although they appear the same.
Be careful, because everyone has both freedoms equally.

So let you just see both your mind and body,
If you would like to balance both freedoms' growth. ao

This short sentence was written, inspired by "The User Illusion: Cutting Consciousness Down To Size" (Nǿrretranders, 1999).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KARA'S TEAR REVIEWED Kara was an anomalistic artificial intelligence which emitted a desire to survive. Yet, in the real world (2019), nothing is evidenced whether the machines' feeling, as well as animals, is authentic. Having seen this exquisite short film (2012) again, my interest is not in ‘AIs’ that will sooner or later threat us but in the human who will no wonder do an impact exactly when the Wreck Havoc occurs. Men tend to think AIs with IC tips are a threat (like humanoids) because they will become wiser than us in the near future. Contrary, the more realistic tipping point might be in our brain (e.g., right temporoparietal junction, rTPJ): the human social skill, shortly, our fallacious compassion for AIs. How many people will soon become more compassionate being against the increasing ‘AIs,’ as of that in the censor in this short film? The truth is, Japan has already witnessed many such cases in elderly welfare and family funerary with a full-f

On Our Two Sexes

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) lived his life in 19th-century Germany. Although his thoughts and philosophy is very hard for us who lives in 21th-century Japan, and it is too dense to understand, recently I found an interesting verse delivered by Zarathustra (1885), "The happiness of man is, ' I will.' The happiness of woman is, ' He will'" (p. 1174 in Kinddle). This line has apparently been understood as a controversy of men's (or his) insolubility in women, which I do not like to participate here. In addition, the snap judgment of his would be subject to criticism from feminist theory and politicalization in many ways than one. Incidentally, however, there is no denial of interpreting this idea from the point of view of natural science. Male sex drives. The strength of man comes from his weakness, want . Further, men simply believe that hiding their weakness must lead to their own happiness. Therefore, men's happiness is not cau

CHANGE!

Kurt Lewin is a founder of dynamic collective power (group dynamics) operating on individual's subtly wavering behavior, mind, and life-space. His equation of behavior, B = ｆ (P, E), which was a hypothesis created by his thorough investigations, tells us that B (behavior) is nothing more or less than a function of the P (person) in their E (environment). This is a beginning of social psychology. A sincere reflection on empirical study was made by this evocative psychologist; “There is no theory without practice and no practice without theory.” However, the entire process of practicing and theory making might have never been fulfilled without his belief about people, i.e., they can CHANGE. ao

Longmanox's Page

Search This Blog